Parquet vs CSV vs Excel
Complete format comparison for data professionals. Performance, file sizes, and when to use each format.
Quick Format Guide
| Format | Best For | File Size | Speed | Max Rows | Compatibility |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Excel (.xlsx) | Formulas, formatting, reports | Medium | Slow | 1M max | ✅ Universal |
| CSV (.csv) | Simple data, compatibility | Large | Medium | Unlimited | ✅ Universal |
| Parquet (.parquet) | Big data, fast queries, analytics | Small | Very fast ⚡ | Unlimited | ⚠️ Data tools |
The Winner for Big Data: Parquet 🏆
When you have:
- ✅10M+ rows
- ✅Need fast filtering/searching
- ✅Repeated analysis on same data
- ✅Large files (multi-GB)
Parquet is 10-100x faster and 80-90% smaller ⚡
Detailed Format Breakdown
Parquet (.parquet) ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
For Big Data
Pros
- ✅Columnar storage = 10-100x faster queries (especially column operations)
- ✅80-90% smaller than CSV (built-in compression, typically 5-10x)
- ✅Preserves schema (data types, column names)
- ✅Industry standard (Apache open-source)
- ✅Billions of rows (no practical limit)
Cons
- ⚠️Not human-readable (binary format)
- ⚠️Requires tools (can't open in Notepad like CSV)
- ⚠️Excel can't open (need conversion tool like Diwadi)
Performance Example (100M rows)
CSV:
- • File size: 20 GB
- • Open time: 5 minutes
- • Filter time: 3 minutes
Parquet:
- • File size: 4 GB (80% smaller)
- • Open time: 10 seconds (30x faster)
- • Filter time: 2 seconds (90x faster)
When to Use:
- • 10M+ rows
- • Fast filtering/searching needed
- • Large file sizes (multi-GB CSVs)
- • Repeated analysis (load once, query many times)
- • Data engineering workflows
CSV (.csv) ⭐⭐⭐⭐
For Compatibility
Pros
- ✅Universal compatibility (Excel, Sheets, pandas, SQL, etc.)
- ✅Human-readable (open in text editor)
- ✅Simple format (just comma-separated values)
- ✅Unlimited rows (no hard limit)
Cons
- ❌Large files (no compression)
- ❌Slow queries (must scan entire file)
- ❌No schema (all values are text, must infer types)
- ❌Encoding issues (UTF-8, ASCII problems)
When to Use:
- • Need universal compatibility
- • Sharing with others (everyone can open CSV)
- • Simple data (no nested structures)
- • 1M-100M rows (if speed isn't critical)
Excel (.xlsx) ⭐⭐⭐
For Business
Pros
- ✅Formulas (calculations, VLOOKUP, pivot tables)
- ✅Formatting (colors, fonts, borders)
- ✅Charts/graphs (visualizations)
- ✅Universal in business (everyone has Excel)
Cons
- ❌1M row limit (hard ceiling, can't exceed)
- ❌Slow performance (>100K rows = freeze/crash)
- ❌Large file sizes (worse than CSV for big data)
When to Use:
- • <1M rows
- • Need formulas, formatting, charts
- • Standard business reports
- • Sharing with non-technical users
When to Convert:
- • File >1M rows → Convert to CSV or Parquet
- • Slow performance → Convert to Parquet for analysis
- • Need faster queries → Convert to Parquet
Performance Comparison (10M rows)
| Operation | Excel | CSV | Parquet |
|---|---|---|---|
| File Size | ❌ Can't create | 2.5 GB | 500 MB (80% smaller) |
| Open Time | ❌ Can't open | 10 sec | 2 sec (5x faster) |
| Filter Rows | ❌ N/A | 30 sec | <1 sec (30x faster) ⚡ |
| Search | ❌ N/A | 25 sec | <1 sec (25x faster) ⚡ |
| Sort | ❌ N/A | 60 sec | 2 sec (30x faster) ⚡ |
| Sum Column | ❌ N/A | 15 sec | <1 sec (15x faster) ⚡ |
Winner: Parquet (10-100x faster for queries, 80-90% smaller)
How Parquet Works (Columnar Storage)
Row-based formats (CSV, Excel)
Problem: To filter by Salary, must scan entire file (all columns)
Columnar format (Parquet)
Advantage: To filter by Salary, only read Salary column (10-100x faster for column operations!)
Conversion Workflows
Excel → Parquet
Use case: Excel file is slow or hitting row limits
CSV → Parquet
Use case: Large CSV file (>1 GB), slow to query
Result: 80-90% smaller file, 10-100x faster queries
CSV to Parquet Converter →Parquet → Excel
Use case: Share Parquet analysis with business users
Note: Excel has 1M row limit. Use CSV for large exports.
Parquet to Excel Converter →Recommendations by Use Case
For Excel Users (Hitting Limits)
Migrate to Parquet workflow:
- Export Excel to CSV (or use CSV export from source)
- Convert CSV to Parquet
- Analyze in Parquet (10-100x faster for analytical queries)
- Export results to Excel (for business users)
Savings: 80-90% smaller files, 10-100x faster queries, no row limits
For Data Analysts (Working with Big Data)
Use Parquet as standard:
- • All datasets >10M rows → Parquet
- • Keep CSV for compatibility/sharing
- • Export to Excel only for final reports
Tools: Diwadi (GUI), pandas (Python), DuckDB (SQL)
For Business Users (Sharing Reports)
Use Excel for final output:
- • Work with Parquet behind the scenes (fast)
- • Export summaries/filtered results to Excel (for sharing)
- • Keep original data in Parquet (no row limits)
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Parquet format? ▼
Why is Parquet so much faster? ▼
Can Excel open Parquet files? ▼
Will converting to Parquet lose data? ▼
Is Parquet only for data scientists? ▼
When should I use CSV vs Parquet? ▼
How much smaller is Parquet? ▼
Can I edit Parquet files? ▼
Is Parquet an industry standard? ▼
Should I convert all my Excel files to Parquet? ▼
The 2025 Data Format Strategy
- 1.Use Excel for business reports (<1M rows, need formatting/formulas)
- 2.Use CSV for compatibility (sharing, universal access)
- 3.Use Parquet for big data (>10M rows, need speed)
Best workflow: Source data → Parquet (fast analysis) → CSV/Excel (sharing)
Download Diwadi Free - Convert Any Data Format